Showing posts with label darren criss. Show all posts
Showing posts with label darren criss. Show all posts

Monday, June 20, 2011

Seven people dinner, dead or alive



I've mixed it up, some people I want to have really good and serious conversations with but seem to still have a certain level of social awareness, and some who seem like fun but would still be willing to participate in a proper conversation. I've had Shopenhauer as my imaginary friend for a while now, I am certain he was full of dry humour that people don't seem to appreciate but that I see all over his writing. So he definitely gets to sit next to me. The rest are arranged in a manner that shakes up their comfort zone on one side and on the other they might be with someone they could have a good conversation with, possibly, when not participating in a general, table wide conversation. I've got Darren Criss on my other side because he seems like a fun person to hang out with, so provides a necessary easing up of the athmosphere while still being perfectly happy with engaging in serious conversations elsewhere.

1. Arthur Schopenhauer

2. Virginia Woolf

3. Coco Chanel

4. Natalie Portman

5. Jean-Paul Sartre

6. Kristen Stewart

7. Darren Criss


How would you arrange your dinner table?

Tuesday, May 24, 2011

Ankles are the beacon of light for change

Remember when ankles were the sexiest part of the body a woman could show? We were heading in the right direction in fashion. Hemlines were changing, and attitudes toward optional silhouettes fast approaching. I might be optimistic, and there is still a long way to go - but the recent nod and inclusion of ankle exposing slim lined suits and trou' for men are very promising in terms of a design breakthrough I hope will catch on.

http://www.gq.com/images/style/2011/06/darren-criss/darren-criss-gq-june-2011-07.jpg
Darren Criss for GQ showing how it's done in ankle exposing trousers

It wasn't that many months ago that at being questioned what my thoughts were on menswear in an interview by Amelia's Magazine I outlined my frustration with the fact that men simply do not experiment. I even went as far as to controversially state that most men I've had the pleasure of working for that far "have bigger mouths than the will to be experimental". I went on to say that "There’s not much room for experimentation for me as a designer, as they’re very specific about what they want and even half an inch down or up is a deal breaker. Hopefully I can be proven wrong one day."

A few days ago I had a few insightful discussions with some of my fellow menswear ethusiasts including the graphic designer David McGillivray and a few Twitter friends during which I came to realize that although there is a variety in menswear, the actual consumer varies from person to person instead of within situations as it does for women. As I said, when mentioning my upcoming collection including both womenswear and menswear, women comment "Oh, I can't wait to see what you've come up with" while men say "I hope the collection includes pieces that are basically what I already wear".

Although the experimentation is minimal and only applied in refinement of an already decided on style instead of a full blown experimentation, instead of being frustrated I'm feeling more driven to crack this nut than ever. I'm lucky that I'm still at the stage where I can establish and refine certain key pieces, design features particular to me and a fit I hope a group of guys will be able to incorporate as part of their already established style. Much like they do. In that respect I will be taking inspiration to their approach to styling and apply it to my approach to designing, different to the way I approach designing for women, which very much fits into the way women style.

I can't wait.

Furthermore, I can see the rays shooting through from behind the horizon. Where ankles pointed to a bright future of female fashion, ankles might be pointing at a bright future in menswear. I might not be alive for it, but I'll gladly join in with the first baby steps.